Abuse & manipulation policy

Abuse and manipulation include, without pretending to be an exhaustive list:

• Publishing the same run twice or reusing a screenshot already bound to another verification (duplicate paths are blocked technically; deliberate retries to bypass controls fall here).
• Passing off stale or altered images as fresh sessions.
• Coordinated or automated flood of bogus submissions to clog or skew review.
• Impersonation, harassment, or coercion aimed at staff or other athletes in verification contexts.

Staff reports on runs. Any participant may submit a report to staff about any published run—including runs that are not their own—when they believe this policy or another verification rule may apply. A report supplies information for review; it does not by itself decline a run or change standings. An athlete challenging their own verification outcome follows the Appeals process—separate from reports about another athlete's run. URX may open or deepen manual review, request evidence, or apply enforcement when a report is substantiated.

URX updates detection continuously—“new” angles usually meet the same decline or enforcement wall. Penalties and Disqualification scale with harm and repetition.

Honest mistakes get verification dialogue; abuse gets enforcement.

See also: Submission requirements; Rule violations; Disqualification.