URX Logo

Verified Performance

Evidence is submitted as tracking-app screenshots from 50+ supported sources; verification combines automation and manual review, with fair play grounded in athlete integrity.

A performance is submitted as a screenshot from a tracking application.
URX accepts evidence from more than fifty different trackers.

This keeps competition open: athletes use the tools they already train with, without being tied to a single platform or integration.

That screenshot forms the basis for verification against the race rules and the applicable mechanic.

Verification process

Each submission passes through two layers:

  • Automated verification — checks manipulation risk, dates, session data, and internal consistency
  • Manual review — applied when automation is uncertain or when policy requires additional scrutiny

A submission may be:

  • Verified
  • Under review
  • Rejected

Time in review does not imply a violation.

Reliability and limits

Verification is designed to be strict, but it is not infallible.

  • Automated checks and manual review can both err
  • A Verified status may be reversed if later review shows the result does not meet the rules

Verification reduces risk.
It does not replace athlete integrity.

What counts

Only submissions in the Verified state count toward:

  • Results
  • Standings

Pending or rejected submissions do not affect competition.

Timing

Most submissions are processed within 24 hours.
In some cases, review may take up to 72 hours.

Queue time reflects workload and scrutiny — not a presumption of wrongdoing.

Scope

Detailed rules for:

  • evidence formats
  • submission requirements
  • verification logic
  • manual review
  • enforcement

are defined under Verification & Enforcement.

The full flow from activity to result is described in Race lifecycle overview.

See also: Race lifecycle overview; Submission requirements; Ethical code.